Other ship types (Offshore) · Bahamas flag · built 2010
SIEM PILOT: CO₂ emissions 2025
IMO 9510307 EU ETS
SIEM PILOT against its type
Built in 2010, it is 1 year older than the median offshore vessel on this register, which was built in 2011 (410 vessels with a known build year). At 5,106 gross tonnage it is larger than 65% of the other 396 offshore vessels with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 34 offshore vessels here under the Bahamas flag, 8.2% of the 413 on the register. No other vessel on this register is recorded with the same builder.
Every return filed for this vessel reports no EU/EEA voyages: zero CO₂ and zero time at sea, left out of the trend and of any ranking.
Emissions by year2025–2025
| Year | CO₂ (t) | Fuel (t) | Distance (nm) | At sea (h) | At berth (t) | kg CO₂/nm | EEOI | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | No EU/EEA voyages reported | |||||||
Vessel particulars
- IMO number
- 9510307
- Ship type
- Other ship types (Offshore)
- Gross tonnage
- 5,106
- Length overall
- 88.0 m
- Year built
- 2010
- Flag state
- Bahamas per EU MRV 2025
Sources disagree: Wikidata/AIS (undated) list Norway. The flag shown is from the newest official source, the EU MRV return for 2025. - Builder
- Eidsvik Skipsbyggeri
- Port of registry
- NASSAU MRV 2025
- Verifier
- DNV, Germany
- Accreditation
- VS-16026-01
- Compliance document issued
- 2026-07-14
- Compliance document expires
- 2027-06-30
Sources and how to read this
- Emissions: EU MRV publication (THETIS-MRV), reporting years 2025–2025, published by the European Commission.
- Vessel particulars: Wikidata (CC0) and Wikimedia Commons.
This page draws on 1 MRV reporting year, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: an efficiency ranking, AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.
Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.