TonneMiles

Container ship · Japan flag · built 2012

ONE HOUSTON: CO₂ emissions 2023–2025

IMO 9566382 EU ETS3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
34,520 t
Fuel burned
11,063 t
Distance
53,099 nm
Time at sea
3,692 h
Emitted at berth
1% of total
Share of year under way
42%
Gross tonnage
96,801
ONE HOUSTON
Wolfgang Fricke, CC BY 3.0 · File

ONE HOUSTON against its type

Built in 2012, it is 4 years newer than the median container ship on this register, which was built in 2008 (3,088 vessels with a known build year). At 96,801 gross tonnage it is larger than 78% of the other 3,000 container ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 22 container ships here under the Japan flag, 0.6% of the 3,495 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 11 other vessels here, 7 of them container ships. The reported port of registry changed: PANAMA (2023–2024), then Tokyo (2025).

Its 34,520 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.1 times the median of 16,359 t among the 2,234 container ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 650.1 kg CO₂, 19% above the type median of 545.6 kg. It logged 3,692 hours at sea against a median of 3,155 hours for its type that year. 0.7% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for container ships was 3.2%. Across 3 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2025 (34,520 t) and the lowest 2023 (23,931 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 24 in 2023 to 29 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 2 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 2 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2023–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 34,520 11,063 53,099 3,692 235 650.1 9.8 29
2024 32,743 10,426 — 3,321 0 671.5 — —
2023 23,931 7,583 34,980 2,317 422 684.1 10.2 24

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9566382
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
96,801
Length overall
334.0 m
Beam
45.0 m
Year built
2012
Flag state
Japan per EU MRV 2025
Builder
IHI Corporation
Port of registry
Tokyo MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (10.3 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-26
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 541 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 29th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 9.8.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 29th percentile, EEOI 9.8

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 3,515,235,234 tonne-miles over 53,099 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2023: 23,931 t202323,9312024: 32,743 t20242025: 34,520 t202534,520

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 44.2% higher than in 2023, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 5.4% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 3.2%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 235 t235Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 546 t546Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 1,021 t1,021Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 17,421 t17,421Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 15,532 t15,532Laden voyagesLaden voyages: 18,488 t18,488

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
35,063 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.55 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.99 t
Under EU ETS
9,737 t, 28% of total

Laden voyages2025

CO₂ on laden voyages
18,488 t, 54% of total
Fuel, laden
5,928 t

The rest of the 2025 total was emitted on ballast legs or at berth.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 3 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage