TonneMiles

Ro-pax ship · Norway flag · built 2007

RAUNEFJORD: CO₂ emissions 2024–2025

IMO 9344772 MMSI 258223000EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
4,814 t
Fuel burned
1,789 t
Time at sea
3,240 h
Emitted at berth
26% of total
Share of year under way
37%
Gross tonnage
6,904
RAUNEFJORD
Jarvin, CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

RAUNEFJORD against its type

Built in 2007, it is 7 years newer than the median ro-pax ship on this register, which was built in 2000 (483 vessels with a known build year). At 6,904 gross tonnage it is smaller than 85% of the other 470 ro-pax ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 37 ro-pax ships here under the Norway flag, 7.5% of the 493 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 10 other vessels here, one of them a ro-pax ship. Fjord1 is linked to 5 vessels on this register. The returns for 2024–2025 all give Florø as port of registry.

Its 4,814 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 84% below the median of 30,062 t among the 417 ro-pax ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 163.6 kg CO₂, 65% below the type median of 467.6 kg. It logged 3,240 hours at sea against a median of 4,243 hours for its type that year. 26.3% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for ro-pax ships was 6.7%. The one sister ship listed below with a 2025 return reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile.

Emissions by year2024–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 4,814 1,789 — 3,240 1,265 163.6 — —
2024 4,690 1,743 — 3,180 1,230 160.3 — —

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9344772
MMSI
258223000
Call sign
LNWU
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
6,904
Length overall
130.0 m
Beam
19.0 m
Year built
2007
Flag state
Norway per EU MRV 2025
Builder
Vard Brattvaag
Port of registry
Florø MRV 2025
Home port
Floro
Operator
Fjord1, Fjord1
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-07-02
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Reported CO₂ by year

2024: 4,690 t20244,6902025: 4,814 t20254,814

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 2.6% higher than in 2024, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 2.6% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 2.1%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,265 t1,265Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 2,407 t2,407Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 2,407 t2,407

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
6,130 t
Methane (CH₄)
45.14 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.20 t
Under EU ETS
4,650 t, 97% of total

Observed movementsAIS · Norwegian waters

First seen
01 Jul 2025
Last seen
02 Jul 2026
Days observed
367
Positions
39,330
Median speed
9.9 kn

Its recorded positions span 58.9°N to 59.8°N and 5.2°E to 5.8°E.

59.0059.255.505.75KarstoStavangerKopervikSandnesSkudeneshavnTanangerFirst observed positionLast observed position10 nm°N°E

400 hourly points from 39,330 positions. Filled circle first, open circle last; squares are ports for orientation, not calls.

Positions recorded per month

Jul 25: 3,680 positionsJul 253,680Aug 25: 2,350 positionsAug 25Sep 25: 3,593 positionsSep 25Oct 25: 3,162 positionsOct 25Nov 25: 3,478 positionsNov 25Dec 25: 3,506 positionsDec 25Jan 26: 3,730 positionsJan 26Feb 26: 3,433 positionsFeb 26Mar 26: 2,574 positionsMar 26Apr 26: 3,142 positionsApr 26May 26: 3,433 positionsMay 26Jun 26: 2,976 positionsJun 26Jul 26: 273 positionsJul 26273

Norwegian Coastal Administration open AIS, Norwegian waters only, 01 Jul 2025 to 27 Jul 2026. A gap means the vessel was not recorded here, not that it was idle or that a transponder was off.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 2 MRV reporting years, 5 of 5 vessel particulars, AIS movements in Norwegian waters and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: an efficiency ranking, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage