Ship Emissions Register

Oil tanker · Denmark flag · built 2010

HAFNIA PEGASUS

IMO 9461659 3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2020
4,382 t
Fuel burned
1,396 t
Distance
12,628 nm
Time at sea
1,189 h
Emitted at berth
1% of total
Share of year under way
14%
Gross tonnage
30,241

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9461659
Ship type
Oil tanker
Gross tonnage
30,241
Length overall
183.2 m
Beam
32.2 m
Year built
2010
Flag state
Denmark
Builder
CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering Company
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (5.96 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2021-06-17
Compliance document expires
2022-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2020

Position 1,529 of 1,708 qualifying oil tankers by EEOI, at the 90th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 8.7; this vessel reported 20.8.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 90th percentile, EEOI 20.8

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 210,979,297 tonn-nmover 12,628 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 6,177 t20186,1772019: 4,385 t20192020: 4,382 t20204,382

Between 2018 and 2020 reported CO₂ fell by 29.1%.

From 2019 to 2020, emissions fell 0.1% while distance sailed rose 13.3%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 11.8%.

Annual returns2018–2020

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2020 4,382 1,396 12,628 1,189 55 347.0 20.8 90
2019 4,385 1,400 11,143 1,224 119 393.5 10.5 68
2018 6,177 1,980 20,841 1,809 126 296.4 10.9 68

Where the 2020 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 55 t55Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 2,210 t2,210Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 2,117 t2,117

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage