TonneMiles

Container ship · Singapore flag · built 2006

MAERSK SEOUL: CO₂ emissions 2018–2025

IMO 9306550 EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
41,121 t
Fuel burned
13,192 t
Distance
56,319 nm
Time at sea
3,376 h
Emitted at berth
1% of total
Share of year under way
39%
Gross tonnage
94,483

MAERSK SEOUL against its type

Built in 2006, it is 2 years older than the median container ship on this register, which was built in 2008 (3,088 vessels with a known build year). At 94,483 gross tonnage it is larger than 75% of the other 3,000 container ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 362 container ships here under the Singapore flag, 10.4% of the 3,495 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 660 other vessels here, 231 of them container ships. Zeaborn Ship Management is linked to 56 vessels on this register. The returns for 2018–2025 all give Singapore as port of registry.

Its 41,121 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.5 times the median of 16,359 t among the 2,234 container ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 730.1 kg CO₂, 34% above the type median of 545.6 kg. It logged 3,376 hours at sea against a median of 3,155 hours for its type that year. 0.8% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for container ships was 3.2%. Of the 5 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 4 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 41,121 13,192 56,319 3,376 344 730.1 11.3 38
2018 1,941 623 — 200 43 1,022.1 48.2 not ranked

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9306550
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
94,483
Length overall
332.0 m
Beam
43.0 m
Year built
2006
Flag state
Singapore per EU MRV 2025
Builder
Hanwha Ocean
Port of registry
SINGAPORE MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (10.9 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Zeaborn Ship Management
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-08-19
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 692 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 38th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 11.3.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 38th percentile, EEOI 11.3

Across the 43 ranked vessels operated by Zeaborn Ship Management, the median percentile is 45. This vessel is more efficient than its own fleet median.

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 3,645,436,170 tonne-miles over 56,319 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 1,941 t20181,9412025: 41,121 t202541,121

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 2,018.5% higher than in 2018, for EU/EEA voyages only. No return is recorded for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, so the series has gaps.

From 2018 to 2025, emissions rose 2,018.5% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 28.6%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 344 t344Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 344 t344Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 2,147 t2,147Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 21,609 t21,609Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 17,021 t17,021

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
41,768 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.66 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.37 t
Under EU ETS
16,287 t, 40% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2025DNVGermany

A change of verifier is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 2 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking and 5 of 5 vessel particulars. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a licensed photograph, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage