TonneMiles

LNG carrier

NUAIJAH: CO₂ emissions 2024–2025

IMO 9976903 EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
57,579 t
Fuel burned
20,999 t
Time at sea
7,373 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
84%

NUAIJAH against its type

The returns for 2024–2025 all give LRMLW as port of registry.

Its 57,579 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.7 times the median of 21,516 t among the 351 LNG carriers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 512.5 kg CO₂, close to the type median of 533.6 kg. It logged 7,373 hours at sea against a median of 2,940 hours for its type that year. 1.6% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for LNG carriers was 2.0%. Of the 8 comparable vessels listed below with a 2025 return, 8 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2024–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 57,579 20,999 — 7,373 949 512.5 — —
2024 714 261 — 86 0 498.9 — —

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9976903
Ship type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
LRMLW MRV 2025
Home port
MONROVIA
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (4.46 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Korean Register, Korea, Republic of
Accreditation
D-VS-20824-01-00
Compliance document issued
2026-02-15
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Reported CO₂ by year

2024: 714 t20247142025: 57,579 t202557,579

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 7,965.5% higher than in 2024, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 7,965.5% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 2.7%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 949 t949Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 949 t949Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 31,865 t31,865Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 24,765 t24,765

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
68,812 t
Methane (CH₄)
378.30 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.42 t
Under EU ETS
29,264 t, 51% of total

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 2 MRV reporting years and 0 of 5 vessel particulars. Not found in the sources for this vessel: an efficiency ranking, AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a licensed photograph, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type