Ship Emissions Register

General cargo ship · Spain flag · built 2007

ROIBEIRA

IMO 9414187 EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
2,765 t
Fuel burned
873 t
Time at sea
1,801 h
Emitted at berth
4% of total
Share of year under way
21%
Gross tonnage
4,990
ROIBEIRA
Alf van Beem, CC0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9414187
Ship type
General cargo ship
Gross tonnage
4,990
Length overall
118.6 m
Year built
2007
Flag state
Spain
Builder
Bodewes Shipyards
Port of registry
MADEIRA
Technical efficiency (design)
Not Applicable (0 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
HELLENIC LLOYD'S S.A., Greece
Accreditation
1190
Compliance document issued
2026-03-31
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2024: 5,566 t20245,5662025: 2,765 t20252,765

Between 2024 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 50.3%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 50.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 10.8%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2024–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 2,765 873 1,801 100 145.8
2024 5,566 1,757 4,112 222 131.5

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 100 t100Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 100 t100Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 359 t359Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 1,461 t1,461Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 844 t844Laden voyagesLaden voyages: 2,161 t2,161

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
2,808 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.04 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.16 t
Under EU ETS
1,565 t, 57% of total

Laden voyages2025

CO₂ on laden voyages
2,161 t, 78% of total
Fuel, laden
682 t
CO₂ per nm, laden
142.4 kg

The share carried on laden voyages separates productive sailing from ballast legs. For tankers, bulkers and ro-ro vessels that split is the operational question; a low laden share means the ship spent much of the year moving empty.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
2
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage