Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Hong Kong flag · built 2018

XING CHANG HAI

IMO 9758492 EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2024
2,031 t
Fuel burned
649 t
Distance
8,724 nm
Time at sea
684 h
Emitted at berth
1% of total
Share of year under way
8%
Gross tonnage
43,017

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9758492
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
43,017
Length overall
228.9 m
Beam
32.0 m
Year built
2018
Flag state
Hong Kong
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (3.49 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2025-02-04
Compliance document expires
2026-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2024

Position 1,104 of 2,858 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 38th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.9; this vessel reported 7.1.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 38th percentile, EEOI 7.1

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 285,304,775 tonn-nmover 8,724 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2023: 2,399 t20232,3992024: 2,031 t20242,031

Between 2023 and 2024 reported CO₂ fell by 15.3%.

From 2023 to 2024, emissions fell 15.3% while distance sailed fell 3.1%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 12.7%.That points mainly to how efficiently it sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2023–2024

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2024 2,031 649 8,724 684 24 232.8 7.1 38
2023 2,399 767 8,999 739 182 266.6 9.0 62

Where the 2024 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 24 t24Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 24 t24Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 913 t913Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 1,094 t1,094

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2024

Total CO₂ equivalent
2,063 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.03 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.12 t
Under EU ETS
1,028 t, 51% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
2
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
4 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type