Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Liberia flag · built 2000

0056 E.R. PUSAN

IMO 9211169 2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2019
55,421 t
Fuel burned
17,788 t
Distance
84,061 nm
Time at sea
6,189 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
71%
Gross tonnage
66,289

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9211169
Previously reported as
E.R. PUSAN
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
66,289
Length overall
277.0 m
Year built
2000
Flag state
Liberia
Builder
Samsung Heavy Industries
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (19.56 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
VERIFAVIA (UK) LTD, United Kingdom
Accreditation
4599
Compliance document issued
2020-04-30
Compliance document expires
2021-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2019

Position 717 of 1,549 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 46th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 17.0; this vessel reported 16.1.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 46th percentile, EEOI 16.1

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 3,444,452,455 tonn-nmover 84,061 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 57,609 t201857,6092019: 55,421 t201955,421

Between 2018 and 2019 reported CO₂ fell by 3.8%.

From 2018 to 2019, emissions fell 3.8% while distance sailed rose 5.9%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 9.2%.That points mainly to how efficiently it sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2018–2019

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2019 55,421 17,788 84,061 6,189 2,597 659.3 16.1 46
2018 57,609 18,489 79,356 6,560 3,438 726.0 18.1 47

Where the 2019 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 2,597 t2,597Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 37,099 t37,099Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 10,842 t10,842Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 4,884 t4,884

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
2
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage