TonneMiles

General cargo ship · San Marino flag · built 1998

BLUE BEAD: CO₂ emissions 2021–2025

IMO 9171113 EU ETS5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
5,688 t
Fuel burned
1,801 t
Time at sea
3,711 h
Emitted at berth
4% of total
Share of year under way
42%
Gross tonnage
18,459

BLUE BEAD against its type

Built in 1998, it is 9 years older than the median general cargo ship on this register, which was built in 2007 (2,852 vessels with a known build year). At 18,459 gross tonnage it is larger than 76% of the other 2,665 general cargo ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 23 general cargo ships here under the San Marino flag, 0.7% of the 3,081 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 307 other vessels here, 26 of them general cargo ships. The reported port of registry changed: MALAKAL HARBOR (2024), then SAN MARINO (2025).

Its 5,688 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.0 times the median of 2,820 t among the 2,469 general cargo ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 172.7 kg CO₂, 41% above the type median of 122.2 kg. It logged 3,711 hours at sea against a median of 3,044 hours for its type that year. 3.7% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for general cargo ships was 4.3%. Across 5 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2025 (5,688 t) and the lowest 2023 (885 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 55 in 2022 to 31 in 2024 (lower is more efficient). Of the 4 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 2 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2021–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 5,688 1,801 — 3,711 209 172.7 — —
2024 5,104 1,617 20,035 3,460 204 254.8 18.4 31
2023 885 281 — 4,010 43 220.7 16.7 not ranked
2022 1,138 361 5,899 577 31 192.9 25.1 55
2021 1,147 363 — 1,606 20 243.0 14.2 not ranked

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9171113
Ship type
General cargo ship
Gross tonnage
18,459
Length overall
170.0 m
Beam
27.0 m
Year built
1998
Flag state
San Marino per EU MRV 2025
Sources disagree: Wikidata/AIS (undated) list Palau. The flag shown is from the newest official source, the EU MRV return for 2025.
Builder
Shin Kurushima Dockyard
Port of registry
SAN MARINO MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (7.92 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Dromon Bureau of Shipping, Greece
Accreditation
1128
Compliance document issued
2026-03-24
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2024

Position 101 of 321 qualifying general cargo ships by EEOI, at the 31st percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 23.6; this vessel reported 18.4.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 31st percentile, EEOI 18.4

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 276,629,810 tonne-miles over 20,035 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2021: 1,147 t20211,1472022: 1,138 t20222023: 885 t20232024: 5,104 t20242025: 5,688 t20255,688

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 395.9% higher than in 2021, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 11.5% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 32.2%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 209 t209Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 209 t209Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 463 t463Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 2,617 t2,617Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 2,399 t2,399

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
5,777 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.09 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.32 t
Under EU ETS
3,180 t, 56% of total

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 5 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking and 5 of 5 vessel particulars. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a licensed photograph, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage