Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Marshall Islands flag · built 2014

BOLTEN ITHAKI

IMO 9691632 5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2022
1,012 t
Fuel burned
324 t
Time at sea
310 h
Emitted at berth
7% of total
Share of year under way
4%
Gross tonnage
23,268

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9691632
Previously reported as
ITHAKI
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
23,268
Length overall
180.0 m
Year built
2014
Flag state
Marshall Islands
Builder
Shimanami Shipyard
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (5.89 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2022)
Verifier
ICS Verification Services Single Member P.C., Greece
Accreditation
1101-3
Compliance document issued
2023-03-15
Compliance document expires
2024-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 3,511 t20183,5112019: 4,471 t20192020: 8,906 t20202021: 4,363 t20212022: 1,012 t20221,012

Between 2018 and 2022 reported CO₂ fell by 71.2%.

From 2021 to 2022, emissions fell 76.8% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 3.2%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2022

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2022 1,012 324 310 66 249.2 21.3 not ranked
2021 4,363 1,384 16,946 1,432 220 257.4 10.9 77
2020 8,906 2,831 31,462 3,667 2,176 283.1 29.8 100
2019 4,471 1,423 22,811 2,490 266 196.0 7.9 47
2018 3,511 1,125 18,684 1,501 147 187.9 9.1 60

Where the 2022 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 66 t66Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 300 t300Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 646 t646

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020ICS Verification Services Single Member P.C.Greece

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage