Ship Emissions Register

Passenger ship · Italy flag · built 2004

COSTA MAGICA: CO₂ emissions 2018–2024

IMO 9239795 4 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2020
20,405 t
Fuel burned
6,519 t
Time at sea
594 h
Emitted at berth
62% of total
Share of year under way
7%
Gross tonnage
103
COSTA MAGICA
Abxbay, CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

No EU/EEA voyages were reported for 2024. The return shows zero CO₂ and zero time at sea, which means the vessel did not sail to, from or between EEA ports that year. It is not a cut in emissions, and that year is left out of the trend and of any ranking.

Emissions by year2018–2024

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2024 No EU/EEA voyages reported
2020 20,405 6,519 — 594 12,593 2,474.0 — —
2019 64,340 20,571 — 4,731 11,086 989.6 — —
2018 59,906 19,103 — 6,951 12,117 1,004.4 — —

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9239795
Previously reported as
GODDESS OF THE NIGHT
Ship type
Passenger ship
Gross tonnage
103
Length overall
272.2 m
Year built
2004
Flag state
Italy
Builder
Fincantieri
Port of registry
Genova
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (10.12 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Costa Cruises, Costa Cruises
Verifier
RINA Services Spa, Italy
Accreditation
002O
Compliance document issued
2021-05-22
Compliance document expires
2022-06-30

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 59,906 t201859,9062019: 64,340 t20192020: 20,405 t202020,405

Between 2018 and 2020 reported CO₂ fell by 65.9%. No return is recorded for 2021, 2022, 2023, so the series has gaps.

From 2019 to 2020, emissions fell 68.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 150.0%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2020 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 12,593 t12,593Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 3,795 t3,795Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 4,018 t4,018

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018RINA Services SpaItaly
2024DNVGermany

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
4
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage