TonneMiles

Vehicle carrier · Norway flag · built 2000

HOEGH TROVE: CO₂ emissions 2019–2025

IMO 9186302 EU ETS7 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
9,912 t
Fuel burned
3,166 t
Distance
28,700 nm
Time at sea
1,967 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
22%
Gross tonnage
58,684
HOEGH TROVE
Wolfgang Fricke, CC BY 3.0 · File

HOEGH TROVE against its type

Built in 2000, it is 8 years older than the median vehicle carrier on this register, which was built in 2008 (595 vessels with a known build year). At 58,684 gross tonnage it is smaller than 54% of the other 571 vehicle carriers with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 54 vehicle carriers here under the Norway flag, 7.6% of the 713 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 360 other vessels here, 8 of them vehicle carriers. The returns for 2019–2025 all give Oslo as port of registry.

Its 9,912 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 40% above the median of 7,074 t among the 514 vehicle carriers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 345.4 kg CO₂, 12% above the type median of 309.1 kg. It logged 1,967 hours at sea against a median of 1,639 hours for its type that year. 3.3% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for vehicle carriers was 3.1%. Across 7 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2024 (14,127 t) and the lowest 2019 (4,443 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 57 in 2019 to 72 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 2 comparable vessels listed below with a 2025 return, 2 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2019–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 9,912 3,166 28,700 1,967 323 345.4 70.3 72
2024 14,127 4,521 43,037 3,097 256 328.2 48.6 42
2023 10,308 3,296 32,083 2,212 361 321.3 60.5 62
2022 8,127 2,592 26,948 1,870 299 301.6 47.7 30
2021 10,255 3,279 33,065 2,359 263 310.1 45.5 19
2020 6,791 2,165 23,439 1,892 873 289.8 69.8 71
2019 4,443 1,419 16,016 1,404 142 277.4 62.2 57

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9186302
Ship type
Vehicle carrier
Gross tonnage
58,684
Length overall
199.9 m
Year built
2000
Flag state
Norway per EU MRV 2025
Builder
Tsuneishi Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Oslo MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (13.81 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-06
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 306 of 423 qualifying vehicle carriers by EEOI, at the 72nd percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 51.7; this vessel reported 70.3.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 72nd percentile, EEOI 70.3

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 140,995,164 tonne-miles over 28,700 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2019: 4,443 t20194,4432020: 6,791 t20202021: 10,255 t20212022: 8,127 t20222023: 10,308 t20232024: 14,127 t20242025: 9,912 t20259,912

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 123.1% higher than in 2019, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 29.8% while distance sailed fell 33.3%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 5.2%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 323 t323Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 329 t329Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 1,021 t1,021Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 5,098 t5,098Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 3,464 t3,464

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
10,067 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.16 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.57 t
Under EU ETS
5,471 t, 55% of total

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 7 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage