Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Thailand flag · built 2012

LANNA NAREE

IMO 9496939 EU ETS4 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
33 t
Fuel burned
10 t
Time at sea
2 h
Share of year under way
0%
Gross tonnage
22,641

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9496939
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
22,641
Length overall
181.0 m
Beam
30.0 m
Year built
2012
Flag state
Thailand
Builder
Jiangsu Yangzijiang Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Bangkok
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (6.35 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, fart_utenfor_3_30_knop (2025)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-20
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 1,333 t20181,3332019: 3,357 t20192024: 3,582 t20242025: 33 t202533

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 97.6%. No return is recorded for 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, so the series has gaps.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 99.1% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 3,123.3%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 33 10 2 0 7,411.4 53.5 not ranked
2024 3,582 1,142 1,622 0 229.9
2019 3,357 1,075 13,546 1,446 90 247.8 9.4 65
2018 1,333 424 4,638 650 76 287.3 11.3 80

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 33 t33

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
33 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.00 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.00 t
Under EU ETS
16 t, 50% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018Bureau Veritas Certification FranceFrance
2024Nippon Kaiji KyokaiJapan

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
4
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage