Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Hong Kong flag · built 2016

LUENHO

IMO 9715220 EU ETS6 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2024
390 t
Fuel burned
123 t
Time at sea
154 h
Emitted at berth
24% of total
Share of year under way
2%
Gross tonnage
24,785

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9715220
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
24,785
Length overall
180.0 m
Beam
30.0 m
Year built
2016
Flag state
Hong Kong
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (4.56 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2024)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2025-03-11
Compliance document expires
2026-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 0 t201802020: 4,333 t20202021: 309 t20212022: 4,422 t20222023: 1,916 t20232024: 390 t2024390

From 2023 to 2024, emissions fell 79.6% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 55.2%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2024

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2024 390 123 154 94 280.7 58.0 not ranked
2023 1,916 615 10,590 927 51 180.9 7.2 40
2022 4,422 1,400 18,891 1,781 273 234.1 7.6 39
2021 309 96 92 0 267.6 11.2 not ranked
2020 4,333 1,383 19,869 1,713 73 218.1 10.4 75
2018 0 0 0 0

Where the 2024 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 94 t94Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 94 t94Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 171 t171Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 126 t126

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2024

Total CO₂ equivalent
396 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.01 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.02 t
Under EU ETS
327 t, 84% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance
2021DNVGermany

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
6
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
4 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type