Ship Emissions Register

General cargo ship · Panama flag · built 2007

NEW AGE

IMO 9414955 EU ETS3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
3,190 t
Fuel burned
1,019 t
Time at sea
1,630 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
19%
Gross tonnage
14,162

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9414955
Previously reported as
SUNNY MARK
Ship type
General cargo ship
Gross tonnage
14,162
Length overall
147.2 m
Year built
2007
Flag state
Panama
Port of registry
Panama
Ice class
PC1
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (8.71 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Korean Register, Korea, Republic of
Accreditation
D-VS-20824-01-00
Compliance document issued
2026-03-27
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 2,210 t20182,2102019: 1,370 t20192025: 3,190 t20253,190

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 44.4%. No return is recorded for 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, so the series has gaps.

From 2019 to 2025, emissions rose 132.9% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 5.3%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 3,190 1,019 1,630 79 187.7
2019 1,370 439 786 31 178.2
2018 2,210 705 970 202 221.6

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 79 t79Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 79 t79Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 146 t146Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 443 t443Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 2,522 t2,522

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
3,240 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.05 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.18 t
Under EU ETS
1,708 t, 54% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018DNVGermany
2025Korean RegisterKorea, Republic of

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
4 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type