Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Norway flag · built 2007

BELFRI: CO₂ emissions 2020–2025

IMO 9369992 3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2023
2,328 t
Fuel burned
745 t
Time at sea
789 h
Emitted at berth
4% of total
Share of year under way
9%
BELFRI
Farid mernissi, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

No EU/EEA voyages were reported for 2025. The return shows zero CO₂ and zero time at sea, which means the vessel did not sail to, from or between EEA ports that year. It is not a cut in emissions, and that year is left out of the trend and of any ranking.

Emissions by year2020–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 No EU/EEA voyages reported
2023 2,328 745 — 789 84 245.8 41.1 not ranked
2020 2,059 654 7,737 736 35 266.1 7.1 36

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9369992
Previously reported as
JIN AN
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Year built
2007
Flag state
Norway
Builder
Kawasaki Heavy Industries
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Home port
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (4.19 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked: transport work below the floor (2023)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2024-05-24
Compliance document expires
2025-06-30

Reported CO₂ by year

2020: 2,059 t20202,0592023: 2,328 t20232,328

Between 2020 and 2023 reported CO₂ rose by 13.1%. No return is recorded for 2021, 2022, 2024, so the series has gaps.

From 2020 to 2023, emissions rose 13.1% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 7.6%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2023 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 84 t84Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 459 t459Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 337 t337Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 1,447 t1,447

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2020DNVGermany
2023NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
3 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage