Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Norway flag · built 1985

COLOR VIKING

IMO 8317942 EU ETS6 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
8,456 t
Fuel burned
2,638 t
Time at sea
1,413 h
Share of year under way
16%
Gross tonnage
11,602
COLOR VIKING
User Heskil on no.wikipedia, Public domain · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
8317942
Previously reported as
SUPERSTAR II
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
11,602
Length overall
134.0 m
Year built
1985
Flag state
Norway
Builder
Nakskov Skibsværft
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (32.22 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Color Line, Scandlines
Verifier
EMICERT, Greece
Accreditation
874-4
Compliance document issued
2026-04-24
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 19,558 t201819,5582019: 21,115 t20192020: 4,931 t20202021: 2,787 t20212022: 14,601 t20222025: 8,456 t20258,456

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 56.8%. No return is recorded for 2023, 2024, so the series has gaps.

From 2022 to 2025, emissions fell 42.1% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 8.7%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 8,456 2,638 1,413 0 368.2
2022 14,601 4,554 2,512 2,180 403.2
2021 2,787 869 460 407 425.4
2020 4,931 1,538 535 1,638 640.0
2019 21,115 6,586 3,429 3,530 428.0
2018 19,558 6,100 3,802 2,857 395.3

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 8,456 t8,456

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
8,585 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.13 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.47 t

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018DNVGermany
2025EMICERTGreece

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
6
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage