TonneMiles

Container ship · Singapore flag · built 2011

COSCO GLORY: CO₂ emissions 2020–2025

IMO 9466245 EU ETS6 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
47,153 t
Fuel burned
15,131 t
Distance
57,199 nm
Time at sea
4,420 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
50%
Gross tonnage
141,823
COSCO GLORY
Markus Pössel, CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

COSCO GLORY against its type

Built in 2011, it is 3 years newer than the median container ship on this register, which was built in 2008 (3,088 vessels with a known build year). At 141,823 gross tonnage it is larger than 88% of the other 3,000 container ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 362 container ships here under the Singapore flag, 10.4% of the 3,495 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 761 other vessels here, 355 of them container ships. The reported port of registry changed: Hong Kong (2020–2024), then Singapore (2025).

Its 47,153 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.9 times the median of 16,359 t among the 2,234 container ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 824.4 kg CO₂, 1.5 times the type median of 545.6 kg. It logged 4,420 hours at sea against a median of 3,155 hours for its type that year. 2.1% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for container ships was 3.2%. Across 6 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2022 (64,728 t) and the lowest 2023 (20,224 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 21 in 2020 to 27 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 4 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 4 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2020–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 47,153 15,131 57,199 4,420 982 824.4 9.4 27
2024 63,329 20,332 69,741 4,492 1,024 908.1 8.4 18
2023 20,224 6,485 25,366 2,283 1,099 797.3 9.8 23
2022 64,728 20,536 64,195 4,247 1,889 1,008.3 11.4 27
2021 63,587 20,168 63,887 4,366 1,691 995.3 10.8 25
2020 31,230 9,903 35,497 2,365 1,183 879.8 9.3 21

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9466245
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
141,823
Length overall
366.0 m
Year built
2011
Flag state
Singapore per EU MRV 2025
Builder
HD Hyundai Heavy Industries
Port of registry
Singapore MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (8.84 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-10
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 503 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 27th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 9.4.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 27th percentile, EEOI 9.4

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 4,995,058,263 tonne-miles over 57,199 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2020: 31,230 t202031,2302021: 63,587 t20212022: 64,728 t20222023: 20,224 t20232024: 63,329 t20242025: 47,153 t202547,153

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 51.0% higher than in 2020, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 25.5% while distance sailed fell 18.0%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 9.2%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 982 t982Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 982 t982Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 7,505 t7,505Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 4,902 t4,902Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 33,765 t33,765

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
47,896 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.76 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.72 t
Under EU ETS
27,820 t, 59% of total

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 6 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage