Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · built 2021

COTE D'OPALE

IMO 9858321 EU ETS5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
33,948 t
Fuel burned
10,893 t
Time at sea
4,893 h
Emitted at berth
8% of total
Share of year under way
56%
Gross tonnage
40,617
COTE D'OPALE
Akela NDE, CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9858321
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
40,617
Length overall
215.0 m
Beam
28.0 m
Year built
2021
Builder
China Merchants Jinling Shipyard (Weihai)
Port of registry
Le Havre
Ice class
IC
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (19.74 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-01-29
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Reported CO₂ by year

2021: 17,370 t202117,3702022: 44,109 t20222023: 37,399 t20232024: 33,702 t20242025: 33,948 t202533,948

Between 2021 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 95.4%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 0.7% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 3.5%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2021–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 33,948 10,893 4,893 2,723 517.7
2024 33,702 10,694 4,661 3,214 536.2
2023 37,399 11,868 4,720 3,079 558.0
2022 44,109 14,164 4,818 2,498 597.1
2021 17,370 5,576 2,166 968 570.4

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 2,723 t2,723Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 2,723 t2,723Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 446 t446Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 14,661 t14,661Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 16,117 t16,117

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
34,483 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.54 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.96 t
Under EU ETS
18,558 t, 55% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2021NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance
2022DNVGermany

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
4 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage