Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Italy flag · built 1999

EXCELSIOR

IMO 9184419 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
71,334 t
Fuel burned
22,893 t
Time at sea
5,918 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
68%
Gross tonnage
40,193
EXCELSIOR
Andrzej Otrębski, CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9184419
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
40,193
Length overall
202.0 m
Year built
1999
Flag state
Italy
Builder
Fincantieri
Port of registry
Palermo
Home port
Palermo
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (25.93 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
RINA Services Spa, Italy
Accreditation
002O
Compliance document issued
2026-03-02
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 95,998 t201895,9982019: 72,915 t20192020: 56,523 t20202021: 59,976 t20212022: 84,667 t20222023: 83,050 t20232024: 77,555 t20242025: 71,334 t202571,334

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 25.7%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 8.0% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 8.8%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 71,334 22,893 5,918 3,903 645.1
2024 77,555 24,891 5,378 3,977 707.2
2023 83,050 26,652 5,844 3,705 732.0
2022 84,667 27,179 5,737 4,306 742.1
2021 59,976 19,129 4,469 1,984 682.2
2020 56,523 18,111 4,641 4,014 658.9
2019 72,915 23,387 5,150 3,364 689.2
2018 95,998 30,797 6,326 3,919 718.7

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 3,903 t3,903Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 3,903 t3,903Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 22,440 t22,440Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 22,866 t22,866Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 22,125 t22,125

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
72,458 t
Methane (CH₄)
1.14 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
4.12 t
Under EU ETS
48,838 t, 68% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage