Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Singapore flag · built 2013

EAGLE I-STAR

IMO 9660085 3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2022
8,614 t
Fuel burned
2,731 t
Distance
32,034 nm
Time at sea
2,555 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
29%
Gross tonnage
34,815

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9660085
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
34,815
Length overall
199.0 m
Beam
32.0 m
Year built
2013
Flag state
Singapore
Builder
Shin Kasado Dockyard
Port of registry
SINGAPORE
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (4.87 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2023-02-14
Compliance document expires
2024-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2022

Position 1,244 of 3,692 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 34th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 8.4; this vessel reported 7.2.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 34th percentile, EEOI 7.2

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 1,198,061,196 tonn-nmover 32,034 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2020: 4,171 t20204,1712021: 1,484 t20212022: 8,614 t20228,614

Between 2020 and 2022 reported CO₂ rose by 106.5%.

From 2021 to 2022, emissions rose 480.5% while distance sailed rose 477.7%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 0.5%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2020–2022

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2022 8,614 2,731 32,034 2,555 261 268.9 7.2 34
2021 1,484 469 5,545 488 75 267.6 5.7 15
2020 4,171 1,317 13,149 1,179 129 317.2 6.3 25

Where the 2022 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 261 t261Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 893 t893Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 5,123 t5,123Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 2,337 t2,337

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage