Ship Emissions Register

LNG carrier · Singapore flag · built 2003

EVEREST ENERGY

IMO 9243148 Sanctions listing5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2023
23,028 t
Fuel burned
7,984 t
Time at sea
1,979 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
23%
Gross tonnage
93,844
EVEREST ENERGY
Jeroen Komen from Utrecht, Netherlands, CC BY-SA 2.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9243148
Previously reported as
BW EVERETT, METAGAS EVEREST
Ship type
LNG carrier
Gross tonnage
93,844
Length overall
277.0 m
Year built
2003
Flag state
Singapore
Builder
Hanwha Ocean
Port of registry
SINGAPORE
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (7.58 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2024-08-29
Compliance document expires
2025-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 18,833 t201818,8332019: 21,811 t20192020: 7,862 t20202021: 10,611 t20212023: 23,028 t202323,028

Between 2018 and 2023 reported CO₂ rose by 22.3%. No return is recorded for 2022, so the series has gaps.

From 2021 to 2023, emissions rose 117.0% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 12.4%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2023

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2023 23,028 7,984 1,979 469 794.3
2021 10,611 3,853 1,041 519 706.7
2020 7,862 2,657 615 0 815.8
2019 21,811 7,867 2,867 1,170 741.8
2018 18,833 6,833 1,922 449 726.5

Where the 2023 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 469 t469Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 8,596 t8,596Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 13,963 t13,963

Sanctions listings

ListProgrammeListedDelisted
ofac_sdn RUSSIA-EO14024 Still listed

Reproduced from the published source register as of the build date, and not legal advice. A listing attaches to the vessel with this IMO number; ownership and management may have changed since. Check the issuing authority before relying on it.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
listed
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage