TonneMiles

Container ship · Portugal flag · built 2003

HYUNDAI CONFIDENCE: CO₂ emissions 2019–2025

IMO 9254848 EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
27,278 t
Fuel burned
8,671 t
Distance
45,595 nm
Time at sea
3,127 h
Emitted at berth
4% of total
Share of year under way
36%
Gross tonnage
64,845
HYUNDAI CONFIDENCE
Wolfgang Fricke, CC BY 3.0 · File

HYUNDAI CONFIDENCE against its type

Built in 2003, it is 5 years older than the median container ship on this register, which was built in 2008 (3,088 vessels with a known build year). At 64,845 gross tonnage it is larger than 59% of the other 3,000 container ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 307 container ships here under the Portugal flag, 8.8% of the 3,495 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 761 other vessels here, 355 of them container ships. Its MRV returns name it HYUNDAI CONFIDENCE for 2019 and MSC ANSHIKA VI for 2025. The reported port of registry changed: JEJU (2019), then Madeira (2025).

Its 27,278 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 1.7 times the median of 16,359 t among the 2,234 container ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 598.3 kg CO₂, close to the type median of 545.6 kg. It logged 3,127 hours at sea against a median of 3,155 hours for its type that year. 3.6% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for container ships was 3.2%. Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 42 in 2019 to 63 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 7 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 6 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2019–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 27,278 8,671 45,595 3,127 989 598.3 17.9 63
2019 17,948 5,747 35,218 2,366 192 509.6 15.0 42

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9254848
Previously reported as
MSC ANSHIKA VI
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
64,845
Length overall
274.7 m
Year built
2003
Flag state
Portugal per EU MRV 2025
Builder
HD Hyundai Heavy Industries
Port of registry
Madeira MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (13.02 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-06
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 1,156 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 63rd percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 17.9.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 63rd percentile, EEOI 17.9

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 1,522,183,036 tonne-miles over 45,595 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2019: 17,948 t201917,9482025: 27,278 t202527,278

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 52.0% higher than in 2019, for EU/EEA voyages only. No return is recorded for 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, so the series has gaps.

From 2019 to 2025, emissions rose 52.0% while distance sailed rose 29.5%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 17.4%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 989 t989Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 989 t989Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 5,090 t5,090Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 12,506 t12,506Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 8,692 t8,692

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
27,703 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.43 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.56 t
Under EU ETS
16,679 t, 61% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2019Korean RegisterKorea, Republic of
2025DNVGermany

A change of verifier is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 2 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars, a name history and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage