Ship Emissions Register

Passenger ship · Norway flag · built 2004

JEWEL OF THE SEAS

IMO 9228356 EU ETS7 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2024
41,865 t
Fuel burned
13,197 t
Time at sea
1,811 h
Emitted at berth
13% of total
Share of year under way
21%
Gross tonnage
90,090
JEWEL OF THE SEAS
User:Dave souza, CC BY-SA 2.5 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9228356
Ship type
Passenger ship
Gross tonnage
90,090
Length overall
293.0 m
Year built
2004
Flag state
Norway
Builder
Meyer Werft
Port of registry
NASSAU
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (10.4 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Royal Caribbean International
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2025-04-11
Compliance document expires
2026-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 60,883 t201860,8832019: 88,384 t20192020: 2,543 t20202021: 30,103 t20212022: 66,504 t20222023: 42,155 t20232024: 41,865 t202441,865

Between 2018 and 2024 reported CO₂ fell by 31.2%.

From 2023 to 2024, emissions fell 0.7% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 5.3%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2024

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2024 41,865 13,197 1,811 5,276 1,403.0
2023 42,155 13,221 1,926 4,542 1,332.7
2022 66,504 20,938 4,330 1,258 1,312.2
2021 30,103 9,450 2,825 713 1,150.5
2020 2,543 793 165 7 912.4
2019 88,384 27,775 5,910 1,722 1,294.3
2018 60,883 19,170 3,599 1,103 1,259.4

Where the 2024 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 5,276 t5,276Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 5,277 t5,277Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 24,339 t24,339Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 6,887 t6,887Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 5,362 t5,362

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2024

Total CO₂ equivalent
42,513 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.66 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.38 t
Under EU ETS
29,400 t, 70% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
7
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage