Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Malta flag · built 2008

MAERSK JUBAIL

IMO 9349045 2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2019
24,276 t
Fuel burned
7,790 t
Distance
56,109 nm
Time at sea
4,025 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
46%
Gross tonnage
28,340

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9349045
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
28,340
Length overall
222.2 m
Beam
30.0 m
Year built
2008
Flag state
Malta
Builder
HD Hyundai Mipo
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (18.12 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
ARKAS Line
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2020-04-08
Compliance document expires
2021-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2019

Position 864 of 1,549 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 56th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 17.0; this vessel reported 18.8.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 56th percentile, EEOI 18.8

Across the 37 ranked vessels operated by ARKAS Line, the median percentile is 77. This vessel is more efficient than its own fleet median.

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 1,291,943,055 tonn-nmover 56,109 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 19,163 t201819,1632019: 24,276 t201924,276

Between 2018 and 2019 reported CO₂ rose by 26.7%.

From 2018 to 2019, emissions rose 26.7% while distance sailed rose 21.6%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 4.2%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2018–2019

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2019 24,276 7,790 56,109 4,025 506 432.6 18.8 56
2018 19,163 6,148 46,141 4,357 510 415.3 18.2 48

Where the 2019 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 506 t506Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 491 t491Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 8,776 t8,776Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 14,502 t14,502

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
2
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage