Ship Emissions Register

Passenger ship (Cruise Passenger ship) · Netherlands flag · built 2003

OOSTERDAM

IMO 9221281 EU ETS5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
32,978 t
Fuel burned
10,510 t
Time at sea
2,993 h
Emitted at berth
15% of total
Share of year under way
34%
Gross tonnage
82,820
OOSTERDAM
Farid mernissi, CC BY 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9221281
Ship type
Passenger ship (Cruise Passenger ship)
Gross tonnage
82,820
Length overall
285.0 m
Year built
2003
Flag state
Netherlands
Builder
Fincantieri
Port of registry
Rotterdam
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (10.7 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Holland America Line
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-19
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 43,305 t201843,3052022: 40,896 t20222023: 46,576 t20232024: 46,128 t20242025: 32,978 t202532,978

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 23.8%. No return is recorded for 2019, 2020, 2021, so the series has gaps.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 28.5% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 13.7%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 32,978 10,510 2,993 4,954 857.9
2024 46,128 14,702 3,416 7,021 994.6
2023 46,576 14,826 3,241 6,387 976.8
2022 40,896 13,002 2,971 5,437 963.9
2018 43,305 13,799 4,612 3,820 992.1

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 4,954 t4,954Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 4,954 t4,954Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 15,963 t15,963Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 6,598 t6,598Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 5,463 t5,463

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
33,494 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.53 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.89 t
Under EU ETS
26,560 t, 81% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage