Bulk carrier · Croatia flag · built 2010
AP KUPARI: CO₂ emissions 2024–2025
IMO 9489168 EU ETS2 reporting years
- CO₂ reported 2025
- 3,869 t
- Fuel burned
- 1,227 t
- Distance
- 13,311 nm
- Time at sea
- 1,384 h
- Emitted at berth
- 5% of total
- Share of year under way
- 16%
- Gross tonnage
- 23,400
AP KUPARI against its type
Built in 2010, it is 2 years older than the median bulk carrier on this register, which was built in 2012 (6,882 vessels with a known build year). At 23,400 gross tonnage it is smaller than 82% of the other 6,571 bulk carriers with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 10 bulk carriers here under the Croatia flag, 0.1% of the 8,138 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 180 other vessels here, 74 of them bulk carriers. Its MRV returns name it RAVNI KOTARI for 2024 and AP KUPARI for 2025. The reported port of registry changed: Nassau (2024), then Dubrovnik (2025).
Its 3,869 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 19% above the median of 3,239 t among the 3,731 bulk carriers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 290.7 kg CO₂, 11% above the type median of 260.7 kg. It logged 1,384 hours at sea against a median of 1,200 hours for its type that year. 5.1% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for bulk carriers was 3.7%. Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 95 in 2024 to 100 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 5 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 5 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.
Emissions by year2024–2025
| Year | CO₂ (t) | Fuel (t) | Distance (nm) | At sea (h) | At berth (t) | kg CO₂/nm | EEOI | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3,869 | 1,227 | 13,311 | 1,384 | 198 | 290.7 | 31.9 | 100 |
| 2024 | 2,496 | 790 | 8,192 | 761 | 225 | 304.7 | 17.5 | 95 |
Vessel particulars
- IMO number
- 9489168
- Previously reported as
- RAVNI KOTARI
- Ship type
- Bulk carrier
- Gross tonnage
- 23,400
- Length overall
- 180.0 m
- Beam
- 30.0 m
- Year built
- 2010
- Flag state
- Croatia per EU MRV 2025
Sources disagree: Wikidata/AIS (undated) list Bahamas. The flag shown is from the newest official source, the EU MRV return for 2025. - Builder
- SPP Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.
- Port of registry
- Dubrovnik MRV 2025
- Home port
- Dubrovnik
- Technical efficiency (design)
- EEXI (5.28 gCO₂/t·nm)
- Verifier
- EMICERT, Greece
- Accreditation
- 874-4
- Compliance document issued
- 2026-03-23
- Compliance document expires
- 2027-06-30
Efficiency against its own type2025
Position 3,232 of 3,241 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 100th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.6; this vessel reported 31.9.
EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 121,252,585 tonne-miles over 13,311 nautical miles.
Reported CO₂ by year
Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 55.0% higher than in 2024, for EU/EEA voyages only.
From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 55.0% while distance sailed rose 62.5%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 4.6%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.
Where the 2025 emissions occurred
Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025
- Total CO₂ equivalent
- 3,929 t
- Methane (CH₄)
- 0.06 t
- Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
- 0.22 t
- Under EU ETS
- 743 t, 19% of total
Verifier history
| From reporting year | Verifier | Accredited in |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Bureau Veritas Certification France | France |
| 2025 | EMICERT | Greece |
A change of verifier is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.
Sources and how to read this
- Emissions: EU MRV publication (THETIS-MRV), reporting years 2024–2025, published by the European Commission.
- Vessel particulars: Wikidata (CC0).
This page draws on 2 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a name history. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a licensed photograph, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.
Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.