Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Liberia flag · built 1997

COMET

IMO 9146106 5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2022
882 t
Fuel burned
281 t
Time at sea
715 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
8%
Gross tonnage
5,997
COMET
Christian Ferrer, CC BY 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9146106
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
5,997
Length overall
113.3 m
Beam
19.4 m
Year built
1997
Flag state
Liberia
Builder
Shin Kurushima Dockyard
Port of registry
Monrovia
Home port
Monrovia
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (11.69 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2022)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2023-04-30
Compliance document expires
2024-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 3,322 t20183,3222019: 3,276 t20192020: 2,545 t20202021: 1,643 t20212022: 882 t2022882

Between 2018 and 2022 reported CO₂ fell by 73.4%.

From 2021 to 2022, emissions fell 46.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 6.0%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2022

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2022 882 281 715 23 124.0 19.9 not ranked
2021 1,643 518 1,161 44 131.9 19.0 not ranked
2020 2,545 799 1,812 70 157.5 35.0 not ranked
2019 3,276 1,041 17,706 2,524 154 185.0 32.3 99
2018 3,322 1,056 21,669 3,034 224 153.3 21.3 98

Where the 2022 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 23 t23Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 34 t34Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 449 t449Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 376 t376

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage