Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Panama flag · built 2007

ES SAKURA

IMO 9374210 3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2021
7,240 t
Fuel burned
2,312 t
Distance
24,058 nm
Time at sea
1,206 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
14%
Gross tonnage
39,737

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9374210
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
39,737
Length overall
224.9 m
Beam
32.3 m
Year built
2007
Flag state
Panama
Builder
Imabari Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (4.34 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
CHINA CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY, China
Accreditation
0003VV
Compliance document issued
2022-04-20
Compliance document expires
2023-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2021

Position 1,328 of 3,276 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 40th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 8.4; this vessel reported 7.7.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 40th percentile, EEOI 7.7

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 936,600,259 tonn-nmover 24,058 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 6,334 t20186,3342020: 14,104 t20202021: 7,240 t20217,240

Between 2018 and 2021 reported CO₂ rose by 14.3%. No return is recorded for 2019, so the series has gaps.

From 2020 to 2021, emissions fell 48.7% while distance sailed fell 51.1%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 5.1%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2018–2021

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2021 7,240 2,312 24,058 1,206 239 300.9 7.7 40
2020 14,104 4,505 49,245 4,203 563 286.4 7.5 43
2018 6,334 2,030 22,841 1,908 326 277.3 5.7 18

Where the 2021 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 239 t239Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 4,475 t4,475Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 2,526 t2,526

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage