Ship Emissions Register

Ro-ro ship · Liberia flag · built 2000

LADY MARIIA

IMO 9220641 Sanctions listing3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2020
2,117 t
Fuel burned
668 t
Time at sea
928 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
11%
Gross tonnage
8,831
LADY MARIIA
Henryvb, CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9220641
Previously reported as
GLOBAL CARRIER
Ship type
Ro-ro ship
Gross tonnage
8,831
Length overall
127.0 m
Beam
20.0 m
Year built
2000
Flag state
Liberia
Builder
P+S Werften
Port of registry
Monrovia
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (14.66 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2020)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2021-02-23
Compliance document expires
2022-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 4,300 t20184,3002019: 3,076 t20192020: 2,117 t20202,117

Between 2018 and 2020 reported CO₂ fell by 50.8%.

From 2019 to 2020, emissions fell 31.2% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 31.5%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2020

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2020 2,117 668 928 96 200.1 253.7 not ranked
2019 3,076 972 1,340 910 291.9 328.7 not ranked
2018 4,300 1,359 2,131 252 196.2 134.0 not ranked

Where the 2020 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 96 t96Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 1,258 t1,258Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 343 t343Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 419 t419

Sanctions listings

ListProgrammeListedDelisted
ofac_sdn RUSSIA-EO14024 Still listed

Reproduced from the published source register as of the build date, and not legal advice. A listing attaches to the vessel with this IMO number; ownership and management may have changed since. Check the issuing authority before relying on it.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
listed
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type