Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Japan flag

NYK OWL

IMO 9741449 5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2022
6,663 t
Fuel burned
2,118 t
Distance
8,588 nm
Time at sea
756 h
Emitted at berth
8% of total
Share of year under way
9%

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9741449
Previously reported as
ONE OWL
Ship type
Container ship
Flag state
Japan
Port of registry
TOKYO
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (6 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2023-04-05
Compliance document expires
2024-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2022

Position 117 of 1,589 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 7th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 16.9; this vessel reported 6.8.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 7th percentile, EEOI 6.8

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 982,793,510 tonn-nmover 8,588 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 24,813 t201824,8132019: 41,714 t20192020: 26,217 t20202021: 13,241 t20212022: 6,663 t20226,663

Between 2018 and 2022 reported CO₂ fell by 73.1%.

From 2021 to 2022, emissions fell 49.7% while distance sailed fell 52.2%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 5.3%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2018–2022

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2022 6,663 2,118 8,588 756 566 775.9 6.8 7
2021 13,241 4,234 17,973 1,294 458 736.7 6.4 6
2020 26,217 8,309 38,974 2,656 979 672.7 5.8 3
2019 41,714 13,380 67,593 4,556 1,624 617.1 6.3 4
2018 24,813 7,954 33,665 2,076 2,140 737.0 7.3 6

Where the 2022 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 566 t566Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 1,272 t1,272Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 4,514 t4,514Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 311 t311

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
1 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type