Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Japan flag · built 2019

ONE GRUS

IMO 9806067 4 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2022
5,080 t
Fuel burned
1,605 t
Distance
7,642 nm
Time at sea
577 h
Emitted at berth
9% of total
Share of year under way
7%
Gross tonnage
145,647
ONE GRUS
kees torn, CC BY-SA 2.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9806067
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
145,647
Length overall
364.0 m
Year built
2019
Flag state
Japan
Builder
Japan Marine United Corporation
Port of registry
TOKYO
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (5.96 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2023-04-05
Compliance document expires
2024-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2022

Position 27 of 1,589 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 2th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 16.9; this vessel reported 5.9.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 2th percentile, EEOI 5.9

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 866,938,567 tonn-nmover 7,642 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2019: 27,851 t201927,8512020: 29,268 t20202021: 20,874 t20212022: 5,080 t20225,080

Between 2019 and 2022 reported CO₂ fell by 81.8%.

From 2021 to 2022, emissions fell 75.7% while distance sailed fell 72.5%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 11.6%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2019–2022

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2022 5,080 1,605 7,642 577 476 664.8 5.9 2
2021 20,874 6,600 27,766 1,987 620 751.8 6.5 6
2020 29,268 9,275 39,372 2,528 1,025 743.4 6.2 6
2019 27,851 8,923 36,772 2,315 700 757.4 6.5 5

Where the 2022 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 476 t476Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 411 t411Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 4,068 t4,068Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 125 t125

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
4
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage