TonneMiles

Vehicle carrier · Japan flag · built 2008

ORCHID ACE: CO₂ emissions 2018–2025

IMO 9381677 EU ETS6 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
10,930 t
Fuel burned
3,497 t
Distance
30,887 nm
Time at sea
1,810 h
Emitted at berth
1% of total
Share of year under way
21%
Gross tonnage
59,262
ORCHID ACE
Ethmostigmus, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

ORCHID ACE against its type

Built in 2008, it is the same age as the median vehicle carrier on this register (build year 2008, 595 vessels with a known build year). At 59,262 gross tonnage it is larger than 57% of the other 571 vehicle carriers with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 66 vehicle carriers here under the Japan flag, 9.3% of the 713 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 102 other vessels here, 50 of them vehicle carriers. The returns for 2018–2025 all give TOKYO as port of registry.

Its 10,930 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 1.5 times the median of 7,074 t among the 514 vehicle carriers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 353.9 kg CO₂, 15% above the type median of 309.1 kg. It logged 1,810 hours at sea against a median of 1,639 hours for its type that year. 1.0% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for vehicle carriers was 3.1%. Across 6 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2025 (10,930 t) and the lowest 2020 (3,299 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 78 in 2018 to 52 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 6 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 5 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 10,930 3,497 30,887 1,810 109 353.9 52.6 52
2023 3,868 1,227 10,439 606 131 370.5 72.1 80
2022 8,971 2,842 28,305 1,673 196 317.0 68.9 71
2020 3,299 1,045 12,648 849 63 260.8 72.6 73
2019 3,975 1,266 12,650 969 136 314.2 64.9 62
2018 7,741 2,472 24,742 1,606 172 312.9 88.1 78

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9381677
Ship type
Vehicle carrier
Gross tonnage
59,262
Length overall
199.9 m
Beam
32.3 m
Year built
2008
Flag state
Japan per EU MRV 2025
Builder
Shinkurushima Toyohashi Shipbuilding
Port of registry
TOKYO MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (19.93 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-04
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 219 of 423 qualifying vehicle carriers by EEOI, at the 52nd percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 51.7; this vessel reported 52.6.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 52nd percentile, EEOI 52.6

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 207,800,951 tonne-miles over 30,887 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 7,741 t20187,7412019: 3,975 t20192020: 3,299 t20202022: 8,971 t20222023: 3,868 t20232025: 10,930 t202510,930

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 41.2% higher than in 2018, for EU/EEA voyages only. No return is recorded for 2021, 2024, so the series has gaps.

From 2023 to 2025, emissions rose 182.6% while distance sailed rose 195.9%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 4.5%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 109 t109Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 109 t109Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 316 t316Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 5,584 t5,584Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 4,921 t4,921

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
11,102 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.17 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.63 t
Under EU ETS
5,452 t, 50% of total

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 6 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage