Ship Emissions Register

LNG carrier · Norway flag · built 2006

ARCTIC PRINCESS

IMO 9271248 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
15,144 t
Fuel burned
5,131 t
Time at sea
1,037 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
12%
Gross tonnage
121,597
ARCTIC PRINCESS
JoachimKohlerBremen, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9271248
Ship type
LNG carrier
Gross tonnage
121,597
Length overall
288.0 m
Year built
2006
Flag state
Norway
Builder
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Nagasaki Shipyard & Machinery
Port of registry
Hammerfest
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (7.26 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-04-14
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 82,513 t201882,5132019: 68,882 t20192020: 76,302 t20202021: 25,473 t20212022: 66,001 t20222023: 60,042 t20232024: 66,416 t20242025: 15,144 t202515,144

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 81.6%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 77.2% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 78.1%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 15,144 5,131 1,037 735 1,693.6
2024 66,416 26,478 5,758 6,225 950.8
2023 60,042 20,900 3,969 8,544 1,283.2
2022 66,001 22,396 4,681 4,926 1,140.6
2021 25,473 8,601 1,781 1,036 936.9
2020 76,302 27,145 6,027 2,926 947.7
2019 68,882 24,432 7,905 4,100 1,197.4
2018 82,513 28,413 7,444 4,431 1,081.4

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 735 t735Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 735 t735Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 6,079 t6,079Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 8,330 t8,330

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
15,347 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.13 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.75 t
Under EU ETS
10,979 t, 72% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage