Ship Emissions Register

General cargo ship · Portugal flag · built 2008

ATALAYA TMA

IMO 9369291 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
3,353 t
Fuel burned
1,046 t
Time at sea
3,028 h
Emitted at berth
6% of total
Share of year under way
35%
Gross tonnage
5,132
ATALAYA TMA
Farid mernissi, CC BY 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9369291
Previously reported as
BEAUTRIUMPH
Ship type
General cargo ship
Gross tonnage
5,132
Length overall
118.1 m
Beam
16.1 m
Year built
2008
Flag state
Portugal
Builder
Damen Shipyards Bergum
Port of registry
Madeira
Home port
Alcudia
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (12.39 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
tma maritíma
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-02
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 3,042 t20183,0422019: 2,923 t20192020: 2,666 t20202021: 4,115 t20212022: 4,374 t20222023: 3,221 t20232024: 4,203 t20242025: 3,353 t20253,353

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 10.2%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 20.2% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 1.4%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 3,353 1,046 3,028 198 108.6
2024 4,203 1,311 3,715 227 110.1
2023 3,221 1,005 2,755 218 111.7
2022 4,374 1,364 5,425 76 110.2
2021 4,115 1,284 4,694 164 122.8
2020 2,666 838 2,433 36 124.8
2019 2,923 933 2,506 109 114.9
2018 3,042 973 2,773 62 137.9

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 198 t198Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 198 t198Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 2,117 t2,117Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 643 t643Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 394 t394

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
3,404 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.05 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.19 t
Under EU ETS
2,764 t, 82% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage