Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Liberia flag · built 2011

CAPE PHOENIX

IMO 9598139 EU ETS5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
0 t
Gross tonnage
92,752

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9598139
Previously reported as
FRONTIER PHOENIX
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
92,752
Length overall
292.0 m
Year built
2011
Flag state
Liberia
Builder
Imabari Shipbuilding Hiroshima Shipyard
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (2.38 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-05-07
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2024

Position 564 of 2,858 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 20th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.9; this vessel reported 5.7.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 20th percentile, EEOI 5.7

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 867,348,592 tonn-nmover 9,972 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 5,375 t20185,3752020: 5,372 t20202021: 4,743 t20212024: 4,927 t20242025: 0 t20250

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 100.0%. No return is recorded for 2019, 2022, 2023, so the series has gaps.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 0 0 0 0
2024 4,927 1,557 9,972 951 50 494.0 5.7 20
2021 4,743 1,504 11,653 1,143 78 407.0 4.2 4
2020 5,372 1,701 11,907 1,047 167 451.2 2.9 1
2018 5,375 1,719 10,417 958 101 516.0 7.7 42

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018Nippon Kaiji KyokaiJapan
2024DNVGermany

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage