Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Tunisia flag · built 1999

CARTHAGE

IMO 9185396 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
41,461 t
Fuel burned
13,303 t
Time at sea
3,230 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
37%
Gross tonnage
31,647
CARTHAGE
DrFO.Jr.Tn, CC BY 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9185396
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
31,647
Length overall
180.0 m
Beam
27.5 m
Year built
1999
Flag state
Tunisia
Builder
Fosen Yard
Port of registry
La Goulette
Home port
La Goulette
Ice class
IB
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (5.22 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2026-06-30
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 70,839 t201870,8392019: 62,755 t20192020: 48,559 t20202021: 56,801 t20212022: 61,810 t20222023: 66,301 t20232024: 56,530 t20242025: 41,461 t202541,461

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 41.5%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 26.7% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 0.6%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 41,461 13,303 3,230 1,425 654.5
2024 56,530 18,136 4,357 1,658 658.8
2023 66,301 21,275 4,994 1,151 678.7
2022 61,810 19,840 4,196 912 707.9
2021 56,801 18,231 3,719 988 738.2
2020 48,559 15,587 3,236 639 727.7
2019 62,755 20,145 4,481 789 692.6
2018 70,839 22,739 4,688 1,045 721.8

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,425 t1,425Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 1,425 t1,425Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 244 t244Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 19,740 t19,740Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 20,053 t20,053

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
42,114 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.67 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.39 t
Under EU ETS
21,565 t, 52% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage