Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Hong Kong flag · built 2019

COSCO SHIPPING AZALEA

IMO 9785756 3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2021
77,056 t
Fuel burned
24,709 t
Distance
92,262 nm
Time at sea
5,669 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
65%
Gross tonnage
143,179

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9785756
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
143,179
Length overall
366.6 m
Year built
2019
Flag state
Hong Kong
Builder
Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (8.24 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
CHINA CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY, China
Accreditation
0003VV
Compliance document issued
2022-04-26
Compliance document expires
2023-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2021

Position 209 of 1,557 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 13th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 16.2; this vessel reported 8.6.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 13th percentile, EEOI 8.6

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 9,001,891,355 tonn-nmover 92,262 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2019: 46,877 t201946,8772020: 63,318 t20202021: 77,056 t202177,056

Between 2019 and 2021 reported CO₂ rose by 64.4%.

From 2020 to 2021, emissions rose 21.7% while distance sailed rose 21.7%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 0.0%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2019–2021

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2021 77,056 24,709 92,262 5,669 1,637 835.2 8.6 13
2020 63,318 20,303 75,809 5,102 1,402 835.2 7.9 15
2019 46,877 15,026 61,768 3,765 995 758.9 7.7 10

Where the 2021 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,637 t1,637Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 16,992 t16,992Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 26,192 t26,192Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 32,236 t32,236

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage