TonneMiles

Container ship · Japan flag · built 2017

MOL TRADITION: CO₂ emissions 2018–2025

IMO 9769300 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
43,569 t
Fuel burned
14,015 t
Distance
51,591 nm
Time at sea
3,396 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
39%
Gross tonnage
210,678
MOL TRADITION
kees torn, CC BY-SA 2.0 · File

MOL TRADITION against its type

Built in 2017, it is 9 years newer than the median container ship on this register, which was built in 2008 (3,088 vessels with a known build year). At 210,678 gross tonnage it is larger than 97% of the other 3,000 container ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 22 container ships here under the Japan flag, 0.6% of the 3,495 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 563 other vessels here, 243 of them container ships. Its MRV returns name it MOL TRADITION for 2018–2021 and ONE TRADITION for 2022–2025. The reported port of registry changed: Majuro (2018–2021), then TOKYO (2022–2025).

Its 43,569 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.7 times the median of 16,359 t among the 2,234 container ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 844.5 kg CO₂, 1.5 times the type median of 545.6 kg. It logged 3,396 hours at sea against a median of 3,155 hours for its type that year. 3.3% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for container ships was 3.2%. Across 8 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2025 (43,569 t) and the lowest 2021 (20,550 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 13 in 2018 to 8 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 6 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 4 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 43,569 14,015 51,591 3,396 1,437 844.5 6.6 8
2024 32,309 10,344 — 3,158 0 814.8 — —
2023 31,200 9,983 41,219 2,972 1,041 756.9 6.8 8
2022 25,206 8,058 27,656 1,780 630 911.4 7.0 9
2021 20,550 6,552 23,699 1,774 918 867.1 6.2 5
2020 39,120 12,521 43,973 2,842 1,647 889.6 5.7 2
2019 27,143 8,691 30,290 2,344 1,029 896.1 11.1 26
2018 24,111 7,693 28,122 2,283 1,064 857.4 9.0 13

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9769300
Previously reported as
ONE TRADITION
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
210,678
Length overall
400.0 m
Year built
2017
Flag state
Japan per EU MRV 2025
Builder
Samsung Heavy Industries
Port of registry
Tokyo MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (7.49 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-17
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 142 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 8th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 6.6.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 8th percentile, EEOI 6.6

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 6,561,605,422 tonne-miles over 51,591 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 24,111 t201824,1112019: 27,143 t20192020: 39,120 t20202021: 20,550 t20212022: 25,206 t20222023: 31,200 t20232024: 32,309 t20242025: 43,569 t202543,569

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 80.7% higher than in 2018, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 34.9% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 3.6%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,437 t1,437Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 1,437 t1,437Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 4,213 t4,213Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 10,676 t10,676Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 27,244 t27,244

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
44,257 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.70 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.52 t
Under EU ETS
23,618 t, 54% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018DNVGermany
2022Nippon Kaiji KyokaiJapan

A change of verifier is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 8 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars, a name history and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage