Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Liberia flag

MSC MARIE

IMO 9962574 EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
12,394 t
Fuel burned
3,977 t
Distance
14,001 nm
Time at sea
897 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
10%

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9962574
Ship type
Container ship
Flag state
Liberia
Port of registry
MONROVIA
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (6.58 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-01-18
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 198 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 11th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 7.1.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 11th percentile, EEOI 7.1

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 1,750,569,209 tonn-nmover 14,001 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2024: 11,715 t202411,7152025: 12,394 t202512,394

Between 2024 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 5.8%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 5.8% while distance sailed rose 7.9%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 2.0%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2024–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 12,394 3,977 14,001 897 599 885.2 7.1 11
2024 11,715 3,760 12,971 914 334 903.2 7.3 11

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 599 t599Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 599 t599Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 1,930 t1,930Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 1,660 t1,660Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 8,206 t8,206

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
12,589 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.20 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.72 t
Under EU ETS
7,461 t, 60% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
2
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
1 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type