Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Panama flag · built 2008

NAVIOS ALDEBARAN

IMO 9442859 3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2020
4,819 t
Fuel burned
1,531 t
Distance
15,805 nm
Time at sea
1,636 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
19%
Gross tonnage
39,737

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9442859
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
39,737
Length overall
224.9 m
Beam
32.3 m
Year built
2008
Flag state
Panama
Builder
Imabari Shipbuilding Marugame Headquarters
Port of registry
PANAMA
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (4.95 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2021-04-02
Compliance document expires
2022-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2020

Position 322 of 2,985 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 11th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 8.1; this vessel reported 5.1.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 11th percentile, EEOI 5.1

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 939,294,347 tonn-nmover 15,805 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 5,284 t20185,2842019: 3,985 t20192020: 4,819 t20204,819

Between 2018 and 2020 reported CO₂ fell by 8.8%.

From 2019 to 2020, emissions rose 20.9% while distance sailed rose 22.4%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 1.2%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2018–2020

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2020 4,819 1,531 15,805 1,636 120 304.9 5.1 11
2019 3,985 1,274 12,911 1,349 76 308.7 5.1 12
2018 5,284 1,680 17,390 1,607 228 303.8 8.5 52

Where the 2020 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 120 t120Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 259 t259Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 658 t658Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 3,782 t3,782

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage