Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Netherlands flag · built 1993

NORBANK

IMO 9056583 EU ETS6 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2024
31,491 t
Fuel burned
9,980 t
Time at sea
4,833 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
55%
Gross tonnage
17,464
NORBANK
Niels Johannes, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9056583
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
17,464
Length overall
167.0 m
Beam
23.4 m
Year built
1993
Flag state
Netherlands
Builder
Van der Giessen de Noord
Port of registry
Rotterdam
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (24.9 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2025-04-08
Compliance document expires
2026-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 37,985 t201837,9852019: 33,983 t20192020: 31,154 t20202021: 25,622 t20212022: 30,164 t20222024: 31,491 t202431,491

Between 2018 and 2024 reported CO₂ fell by 17.1%. No return is recorded for 2023, so the series has gaps.

From 2022 to 2024, emissions rose 4.4% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 3.0%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2024

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2024 31,491 9,980 4,833 1,055 414.4
2022 30,164 9,650 4,812 1,316 427.0
2021 25,622 8,212 4,309 774 415.4
2020 31,154 9,977 4,922 1,961 438.2
2019 33,983 10,873 5,264 2,351 474.9
2018 37,985 12,168 5,046 2,805 503.8

Where the 2024 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,055 t1,055Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 1,055 t1,055Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 170 t170Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 14,917 t14,917Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 15,348 t15,348

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2024

Total CO₂ equivalent
31,981 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.50 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.80 t
Under EU ETS
16,358 t, 52% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
6
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage