TonneMiles

Container ship · Singapore flag · built 2022

ONE FREEDOM: CO₂ emissions 2022–2025

IMO 9934357 EU ETS4 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
48,078 t
Fuel burned
15,468 t
Distance
61,877 nm
Time at sea
4,840 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
55%
ONE FREEDOM
Farid mernissi, CC BY 4.0 · File

ONE FREEDOM against its type

Built in 2022, it is 14 years newer than the median container ship on this register, which was built in 2008 (3,088 vessels with a known build year). It is one of 362 container ships here under the Singapore flag, 10.4% of the 3,495 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 127 other vessels here, 46 of them container ships. The reported port of registry changed: Hong Kong (2022–2024), then Singapore (2025).

Its 48,078 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.9 times the median of 16,359 t among the 2,234 container ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 777.0 kg CO₂, 42% above the type median of 545.6 kg. It logged 4,840 hours at sea against a median of 3,155 hours for its type that year. 2.7% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for container ships was 3.2%. Across 4 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2024 (58,196 t) and the lowest 2022 (7,457 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 2 in 2022 to 19 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 2 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 2 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2022–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 48,078 15,468 61,877 4,840 1,319 777.0 8.2 19
2024 58,196 18,682 75,554 5,221 1,272 770.2 6.8 8
2023 8,076 2,579 11,892 1,051 792 679.1 9.4 20
2022 7,457 2,384 12,955 1,171 187 575.6 5.9 2

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9934357
Ship type
Container ship
Year built
2022
Flag state
Singapore per EU MRV 2025
Sources disagree: Wikidata/AIS (undated) list Hong Kong. The flag shown is from the newest official source, the EU MRV return for 2025.
Builder
Jiangsu Yangzijiang Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Singapore MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (7.54 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-30
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 360 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 19th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 8.2.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 19th percentile, EEOI 8.2

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 5,863,180,488 tonne-miles over 61,877 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2022: 7,457 t20227,4572023: 8,076 t20232024: 58,196 t20242025: 48,078 t202548,078

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 544.7% higher than in 2022, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 17.4% while distance sailed fell 18.1%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 0.9%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,319 t1,319Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 1,319 t1,319Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 3,048 t3,048Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 17,073 t17,073Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 26,638 t26,638

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
48,838 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.77 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.78 t

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2022DNVGermany
2025Nippon Kaiji KyokaiJapan

A change of verifier is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 4 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 3 of 5 vessel particulars and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage