Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Tunisia flag · built 2012

TANIT

IMO 9598579 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
85,197 t
Fuel burned
27,223 t
Time at sea
4,891 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
56%
Gross tonnage
52,645
TANIT
Mohatatou, CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9598579
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
52,645
Length overall
212.0 m
Year built
2012
Flag state
Tunisia
Builder
Hanwha Ocean
Port of registry
La Goulette
Home port
La Goulette
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (2.85 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2026-06-30
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 68,860 t201868,8602019: 78,711 t20192020: 49,738 t20202021: 60,127 t20212022: 70,967 t20222023: 70,625 t20232024: 66,929 t20242025: 85,197 t202585,197

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 23.7%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 27.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 0.9%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 85,197 27,223 4,891 2,976 945.2
2024 66,929 21,472 3,268 2,154 954.2
2023 70,625 22,658 2,644 2,224 1,223.9
2022 70,967 22,781 2,744 726 1,123.4
2021 60,127 19,298 2,250 725 1,147.6
2020 49,738 15,955 1,936 1,709 1,154.0
2019 78,711 25,248 2,990 2,757 1,168.2
2018 68,860 22,098 2,865 1,079 1,079.5

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 2,976 t2,976Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 2,976 t2,976Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 41,351 t41,351Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 40,870 t40,870

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
86,533 t
Methane (CH₄)
1.36 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
4.90 t
Under EU ETS
44,086 t, 52% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage