Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Hong Kong flag · built 2015

TIGER HEBEI

IMO 9712204 EU ETS5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
2,354 t
Fuel burned
746 t
Time at sea
815 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
9%
Gross tonnage
36,322

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9712204
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
36,322
Length overall
199.9 m
Beam
32.3 m
Year built
2015
Flag state
Hong Kong
Builder
Jiangsu Yangzi Xinfu Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (3.83 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2025)
Verifier
CHINA CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY, China
Accreditation
0003VV
Compliance document issued
2026-03-31
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2020: 2,296 t20202,2962021: 6,257 t20212022: 7,074 t20222024: 11 t20242025: 2,354 t20252,354

Between 2020 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 2.5%. No return is recorded for 2023, so the series has gaps.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 22,252.0% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 237.1%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2020–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 2,354 746 815 108 258.0 31.0 not ranked
2024 11 3 12 0 76.5 3.9 not ranked
2022 7,074 2,250 24,514 2,339 667 288.6 6.8 30
2021 6,257 2,001 21,610 1,850 21 289.5 5.5 13
2020 2,296 729 8,182 830 59 280.6 7.0 35

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 108 t108Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 108 t108Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 53 t53Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 930 t930Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 1,263 t1,263

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
2,390 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.04 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.13 t
Under EU ETS
1,257 t, 53% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage