Ship Emissions Register

Chemical tanker · Netherlands flag

ASTELLA

IMO 9904041 EU ETS4 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
7,135 t
Fuel burned
2,479 t
Distance
53,136 nm
Time at sea
4,719 h
Emitted at berth
17% of total
Share of year under way
54%

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9904041
Previously reported as
BIT WAVE
Ship type
Chemical tanker
Flag state
Netherlands
Port of registry
Dordrecht
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (7.3 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-27
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 970 of 1,348 qualifying chemical tankers by EEOI, at the 72th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.4; this vessel reported 21.6.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 72th percentile, EEOI 21.6

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 330,916,512 tonn-nmover 53,136 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2022: 5,553 t20225,5532023: 8,824 t20232024: 7,365 t20242025: 7,135 t20257,135

Between 2022 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 28.5%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 3.1% while distance sailed fell 3.8%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 0.8%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2022–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 7,135 2,479 53,136 4,719 1,246 134.3 21.6 72
2024 7,365 2,554 55,262 4,738 1,363 133.3 19.1 62
2023 8,824 2,768 58,327 4,955 1,031 151.3 22.1 69
2022 5,553 1,736 32,986 2,897 672 168.3 24.3 95

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,246 t1,246Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 1,249 t1,249Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 5,885 t5,885

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
8,495 t
Methane (CH₄)
45.42 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.34 t
Under EU ETS
7,135 t, 100% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
4
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
1 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type