Ship Emissions Register

Refrigerated cargo carrier · Lithuania flag · built 1992

AURIGA

IMO 8920983 6 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2023
1,501 t
Fuel burned
480 t
Time at sea
1,051 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
12%
Gross tonnage
5,084
AURIGA
Wolfgang Fricke, CC BY 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
8920983
Previously reported as
HARENGUS
Ship type
Refrigerated cargo carrier
Gross tonnage
5,084
Length overall
109.0 m
Beam
18.0 m
Year built
1992
Flag state
Lithuania
Builder
Hollming
Port of registry
Klaipeda
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (20.74 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2023)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2024-02-22
Compliance document expires
2025-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 4,069 t20184,0692019: 1,384 t20192020: 3,297 t20202021: 1,820 t20212022: 1,909 t20222023: 1,501 t20231,501

Between 2018 and 2023 reported CO₂ fell by 63.1%.

From 2022 to 2023, emissions fell 21.4% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 4.0%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2023

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2023 1,501 480 1,051 29 122.4 129.2 not ranked
2022 1,909 612 16,226 1,403 113 117.7 84.4 86
2021 1,820 582 1,479 143 144.5 81.1 not ranked
2020 3,297 1,055 20,677 2,526 166 159.4 83.0 83
2019 1,384 441 10,624 880 39 130.2 46.9 24
2018 4,069 1,294 3,601 501 159.6

Where the 2023 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 29 t29Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 844 t844Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 629 t629

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018Bureau Veritas Certification FranceFrance
2020DNVGermany

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
6
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage