TonneMiles

Chemical tanker · Norway flag · built 2006

BOW SIRIUS: CO₂ emissions 2018–2025

IMO 9215294 EU ETS7 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
3,896 t
Fuel burned
1,244 t
Distance
12,156 nm
Time at sea
989 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
11%
Gross tonnage
29,965
BOW SIRIUS
Bob Adams from Amanzimtoti, South Africa, CC BY-SA 2.0 · File

BOW SIRIUS against its type

Built in 2006, it is 4 years older than the median chemical tanker on this register, which was built in 2010 (1,951 vessels with a known build year). At 29,965 gross tonnage it is larger than 87% of the other 1,899 chemical tankers with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 95 chemical tankers here under the Norway flag, 4.1% of the 2,344 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 80 other vessels here, 7 of them chemical tankers. The returns for 2018–2025 all give Bergen as port of registry.

Its 3,896 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 30% below the median of 5,533 t among the 1,483 chemical tankers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 320.5 kg CO₂, 28% above the type median of 250.2 kg. It logged 989 hours at sea against a median of 2,109 hours for its type that year. 2.2% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for chemical tankers was 6.6%. Across 7 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2018 (15,416 t) and the lowest 2023 (3,322 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 32 in 2018 to 19 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 6 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 4 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 3,896 1,244 12,156 989 85 320.5 9.1 19
2024 14,581 4,649 40,427 3,273 788 360.7 11.4 29
2023 3,322 1,047 9,188 685 391 361.5 11.2 25
2021 12,960 4,098 32,868 3,062 868 394.3 12.0 25
2020 14,311 4,530 36,245 2,823 979 394.9 12.3 28
2019 5,024 1,605 12,706 1,007 386 395.4 14.9 41
2018 15,416 4,920 40,396 3,331 1,236 381.6 12.9 32

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9215294
Ship type
Chemical tanker
Gross tonnage
29,965
Length overall
183.0 m
Beam
32.0 m
Year built
2006
Flag state
Norway per EU MRV 2025
Builder
Szczecin Shipyard
Port of registry
Bergen MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (4.99 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-24
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 259 of 1,348 qualifying chemical tankers by EEOI, at the 19th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.4; this vessel reported 9.1.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 19th percentile, EEOI 9.1

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 427,613,611 tonne-miles over 12,156 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 15,416 t201815,4162019: 5,024 t20192020: 14,311 t20202021: 12,960 t20212023: 3,322 t20232024: 14,581 t20242025: 3,896 t20253,896

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 74.7% lower than in 2018, for EU/EEA voyages only. No return is recorded for 2022, so the series has gaps.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 73.3% while distance sailed fell 69.9%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 11.1%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 85 t85Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 163 t163Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 150 t150Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 3,583 t3,583

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
3,957 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.06 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.22 t
Under EU ETS
1,929 t, 50% of total

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 7 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage