Bulk carrier · Hong Kong flag · built 2009
CBL SPRING: CO₂ emissions 2018–2025
IMO 9482483 EU ETS5 reporting years
- CO₂ reported 2025
- 1,636 t
- Fuel burned
- 520 t
- Distance
- 6,521 nm
- Time at sea
- 577 h
- Emitted at berth
- 10% of total
- Share of year under way
- 7%
CBL SPRING against its type
Built in 2009, it is 3 years older than the median bulk carrier on this register, which was built in 2012 (6,882 vessels with a known build year). It is one of 637 bulk carriers here under the Hong Kong flag, 7.8% of the 8,138 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 114 other vessels here, 111 of them bulk carriers. Its MRV returns name it NEW VENTURE for 2018–2023 and CBL SPRING for 2025. The returns for 2018–2025 all give Hong Kong as port of registry.
Its 1,636 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 49% below the median of 3,239 t among the 3,731 bulk carriers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 250.9 kg CO₂, close to the type median of 260.7 kg. It logged 577 hours at sea against a median of 1,200 hours for its type that year. 9.8% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for bulk carriers was 3.7%. Across 5 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2020 (6,182 t) and the lowest 2023 (1,030 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 71 in 2018 to 93 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 4 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 3 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.
Emissions by year2018–2025
| Year | CO₂ (t) | Fuel (t) | Distance (nm) | At sea (h) | At berth (t) | kg CO₂/nm | EEOI | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1,636 | 520 | 6,521 | 577 | 161 | 250.9 | 14.3 | 93 |
| 2023 | 1,030 | 326 | — | 278 | 146 | 323.9 | 26.4 | not ranked |
| 2020 | 6,182 | 1,972 | 18,004 | 2,658 | 525 | 343.4 | 8.7 | 58 |
| 2019 | 2,569 | 825 | 10,448 | 1,013 | 0 | 245.9 | 6.3 | 25 |
| 2018 | 3,491 | 1,119 | 10,820 | 1,032 | 51 | 322.6 | 10.1 | 71 |
Vessel particulars
- IMO number
- 9482483
- Previously reported as
- NEW VENTURE
- Ship type
- Bulk carrier
- Year built
- 2009
- Flag state
- Hong Kong per EU MRV 2025
- Builder
- Chengxi Shipyard
- Port of registry
- Hong Kong MRV 2025
- Home port
- Hong Kong
- Technical efficiency (design)
- EEXI (4.28 gCO₂/t·nm)
- Verifier
- Bureau Veritas Certification France, France
- Accreditation
- 3-2047 rev. 4
- Compliance document issued
- 2026-02-09
- Compliance document expires
- 2027-06-30
Efficiency against its own type2025
Position 3,020 of 3,241 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 93rd percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.6; this vessel reported 14.3.
EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 114,671,338 tonne-miles over 6,521 nautical miles.
Reported CO₂ by year
Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 53.1% lower than in 2018, for EU/EEA voyages only. No return is recorded for 2021, 2022, 2024, so the series has gaps.
From 2023 to 2025, emissions rose 58.9% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 22.5%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.
Where the 2025 emissions occurred
Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025
- Total CO₂ equivalent
- 1,662 t
- Methane (CH₄)
- 0.03 t
- Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
- 0.09 t
- Under EU ETS
- 1,288 t, 79% of total
Laden voyages2025
- CO₂ on laden voyages
- 778 t, 48% of total
- Fuel, laden
- 248 t
- CO₂ per nm, laden
- 230.3 kg
The rest of the 2025 total was emitted on ballast legs or at berth.
Sources and how to read this
- Emissions: EU MRV publication (THETIS-MRV), reporting years 2018–2025, published by the European Commission.
- Vessel particulars: Wikidata (CC0).
This page draws on 5 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 3 of 5 vessel particulars and a name history. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a licensed photograph, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.
Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.